• SciREX 科学技術イノベーション政策における「政策のための科学」
  • 科学技術イノベーション 政策研究の過去・現在・未来 2012年12月14日(金)

イベント

開催日 2016.06.02 - 2016.06.02 東京大学

第44回STIG PoPセミナー: The Changing State of Knowledge Exchange in the UK: 2005-2015

第44回STIG PoPセミナー: The Changing State of Knowledge Exchange in the UK: 2005-2015

日時:2016年6月2日(木)17:00~18:30
会場:東京大学本郷キャンパス 法学政治学総合教育棟201教室
講師:Dr. Cornelia Lawson, 日本学術振興会特別研究員/ケンブリッジ大学研究員
主催:東京大学科学技術イノベーション政策の科学(STIG)教育・研究ユニット
言語:英語(同時通訳はありません)
参加お申し込みはこちらから

【概要】
Using data based on two unique surveys of UK academic engagement with external organisations covering all disciplines at all UK universities(the first conducted in 2008/9 generated 22,000 responses; the second in 2015 generated 18,000 responses) this talk addresses changes in knowledge exchange activities as well as their dynamics. The comparison is based on a matched set of academics as well as a panel of over 4000 academics that answered to both surveys. The matched analysis shows there has been a decline in commercialisation: in 2008/9, 8% of academics reported that they had taken out a patent and 15% had formed or run a consultancy, compared to just 6% and 7% respectively in the more macro-economically constrained 2012-15 period. Instead, engagement in less costly activities, such as lectures for the community have increased, as has the importance of teaching motives as reasons for engagement. The panel results additionally show that engagement is typically a recurrent persistent activity. The decision to sustain engagement levels is largely explained by past engagement efforts and the research orientation of the individual. Prior experience in engagement and a research orientation towards applied or user oriented basic research are positively related to future engagement. These forces are particularly associated with persistence in commercial activities and services. We further find that engagement persistence is partly driven by the underlying motivations of academics for engagement, and that learning and research are the most important motivations, while financial motives are ranked lowest.

TOP